Black Prison Population Disproportionate In Wisconsin???? Gee, Let's Play The Race Card

Yep, here we go again.

Because blacks make up 6% of the Wisconsin population and 46% of the Wisconsin prison population, it must be racism.

Eugene Kane, Wisconsin's biggest racist, wrote an article in the Journal Sentinel about it
here if you can actually keep your lunch down long enough to read his drivel. People like this NEED racism and play the race card whenever possible, otherwise he wouldn't have a job.

Here are a few outtakes from his bullshit that I thought I would answer for him"

Eugene Kane "Wisconsin is among the top states in the country when it comes to locking up black men. The rate is 10.6 times the rate for white men.."
Answer : Guess what dumbass, they are perpetrating more violent crimes that DESERVE jail time. Do you honestly believe that white men get let off for the same crime?? The cops catch a white guy robbing a liquor store and say "gee Ralph, have to let this one go, he isn't black".

Eugene Kane "I've visited two prisons this summer, in Plymouth and Racine, and it's always depressing to see the disproportionate representation of black and brown faces."
Answer : Then start addressing the damn problem in your community and stop making excuses for them.

Eugene Kane "a comment from an inmate floored me...He talked about his younger brother, who actually considered it a badge of honor to have an older sibling in prison."
Answer : This is exactly what I'm talking about. If this is the mindset of the young black men in Wisconsin, how exactly is it the white man's fault again? This bullshit thug mentality should be your target, not how the white man is keeping you down. Of course if you actually did something to change things you wouldn't have a job anymore would you.

Eugene Kane "After all, to many folks, it's a simple equation: Black guys commit more crimes than anybody else, end of story. But it's really not that simple, no matter how many people want it to be true.
Answer : Nobody wants it to be true. That would be why we put them in jail in the hope that they won't do it again when they get out. I suppose Eugene must think that all the blacks in jail are innocent. How pathetic do you have to be to ignore the facts to further your own agenda?

Eugene Kane "the only people who actually believe African-Americans are the only ones using illegal drugs, stealing property, driving drunk or committing violent crimes must be convinced black folks are truly a demon spawn."
Answer : Who said they were the ONLY ones? Why do you feel the need to exaggerate the facts? A true sign of someone reaching for anything to help their feeble point. We have a 10yr old with the same mentality....hopefully he grows out of that by the time he's your age.

Eugene Kane "the numbers do suggest the criminal justice system somehow finds it much easier to send black guys to prison..."
Answer : No, you suggest that. The numbers suggest that the majority of the violent crime is being commited by blacks in the inner city and people like you don't know what to do about it so you blame the white establishment. When exactly do people like you plan on getting out behind your race card and taking responsibility for the actions of your community?

Eugene Kane "When I visit prisons, I'm always impressed at the candor of the inmates. They don't offer many excuses for their situation...
Answer : Then why do you? Try spending as much energy in your community fixing the problem as you do making excuses for those who aren't even making escuses for themselves?

Basically Eugene, you're a racist who is full of shit and need to keep racism alive so that you have something to bitch about. There are more men in prison than women...why aren't you complaining about that and saying how the system is gender bias? Doesn't fit your agenda huh?
Your own article says how the younger thugs are looking up to their friends and relatives in prison like it's a badge of honor.....why can't you see that as a problem in your own community to fix?
It's just so much easier to blame someone else and do nothing about the real problem....I understand, you're all talk.

I think I'm Going To Write Again......

Not sure if anyone ever looks here anymore or if anyone cares but there is alot of crap grating on my nerves lately and I think it's time to vent some.
Now...where to start....

What Idiot Is Going To Buy The OJ Book????????

Unbelievable....the dumbass is actually publishing a book about how he would have killed Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman "IF" he would have been the one to do it. How stupid do you have to be to buy this book and support this ass? I still can't believe how a good portion of the black community was so pleased he was found not guilty simply because he was black. I never knew there were that many racist fools.
At least FOX has refused to air the interview on many of their stations that they did with him about the killings and about his new book coming out at the end of the month. I can't believe anyone would really care to watch him gloat about getting away with murder anyway....well, at least not anyone that has matured past the age of 15. I'm sure there are those that haven't, at least mentally.
I've read in the Times that Ron Goldmans family is petitioning to seize any financial gain that the dumbass collects from this publishing. Is a nice thought and I hope they succeed but unfortunatley he will probably end up profiting from the murders.
What we can do is not buy the book, not put money in his pocket to reward him for getting away with two murders and we can take some solace in the fact that he has yet to be judged by the highest court. I doubt God will be as lenient on OJ, and I'm sure he won't be writing a book about that trial.

Milwaukee, The Wild West Meets The Twilight Zone

Ya, I've been gone from this blog for awhile....guess I either got tired of it or nothing was pissing me off enough...guess what...I'm back.

It came out in the paper today that our wonderful city is averaging 600 shootings a year and it is expected to go up 34% next year.(this is the wild west part) Let me say that again....SIX HUNDRED shootings a year...wtf?? Only a 150 or so die so that either says we have great health care or poor aiming skills.
Guess what our Police Chief, Nan Hagerty, is considering for a solution? You're gonna love this (this is the twilight zone part). She is suggesting that for non-lifethreatening problems, the citizens of Milwaukee go online and file a report instead of calling the police. No, really people...ya can't make this crap up. Read it for yourself here
So basically if you are being robbed, raped, beaten up, car stolen, house broken into or just loud music at 4am by the neighbors, you are on your own. Hey, isn't it a good thing that our idiot Governor (that you people JUST reelected) keeps giving his veto to our gun carry law we've tried to pass? That may actually make the number of shootings go down if they knew the good guys had guns too....I'm sure the criminals are happy with all of these revelations huh? WTF???
Now not only do we pay the highest taxes of most states (which is increasing again, but thats another blog), now we can pay those high taxes without being able to call the police unless we've been shot, which is one of the reason we pay taxes in the first damn place. Welcome to a Democratic run state. Since the laws don't apply in Wisconsin to illegal immigrants, maybe at least they will be able to still use the police to serve and protect them....so that's something anyway.
Oh well, get ready to pay someone to do a job they make you do (the twilight zone) and buy yourself a gun so you can get it done (the wild west). Hmm...I wonder if the criminals are allowed to call the police if they see you with a gun you're not suppose to have? shhhhh......it would't surprise me.

Favre, PLEASE Retire

Finally the wonderful Brett has an interview yesterday and says

"I wish I knew," Favre said. "I still know I can play. I still love to play. But there's just so much more to it than that now. I never thought it would be complicated, never thought I would give out mentally before I did physically.
"But right now if I had to pick, if someone said make a damn decision and live with it, I would say I'm not coming back."

Well here is to hoping he doesn't come back. Would be nice to hear these cheeseheads around here talk about something other than the magical can do no wrong Brett Favre. Must be a little frustrating for the rest of the team as well to constantly hear that everything that goes wrong is everyone elses fault but Brett's and that Brett is the only player on the team and has no one to throw to. Actually he has a lot of people to throw to, look at his career high 29 interceptions! LOL. Of course those were everyone elses faults too.

There is no doubt that he was a great football player. Unfortunatley the bulk of the fans here are psychotic. He is not and never has been the whole team. Every bad thing that happens is not everyone's fault but his. He had a rating of 70.9 this past year. He had more interceptions than ever before. Those are his fault, not the rest of the teams, and yes there actually is other players than him on the team.

Hey maybe he can run for Governor? Sadly these people here in Wisconsin would probably elect him.

Goodbye Brett......PLEASE....goodbye.

Racism In Germantown Is Bullshit, Eugene Kane Disappointed.

Early in December Eugene Kane wrote this article about a black woman in Germantown whose house mysteriously burned and then a racial slur saying "Dont Come Back Nigger" showed up on her garage showed up. In his article he states things like:

"But as Smith's story demonstrated, sometimes there's ugliness beneath the pristine beauty."
and
"Unlike some people in Germantown, she wants to confront this ugly reality and not just cover it up in the hope it will disappear."
and
"According to Germantown police Chief Peter Hoell, the investigation into the incident, including possible arson involving Smith's home, was ongoing"
and
"To this city dweller, it does seem like the Village of Germantown is more concerned about getting Smith to paint her garage to appease her neighbors than finding out who put the racial slur there in the first place."


well gee, come to find out
1. The poor victim just happened to put most of her belongings in storage before the fire.
2. She has a string of court judgments against her regarding unpaid debts.
3. She and her husband also owe approximately $8000 in back property taxes on the home.
4. A gas line from the kitchen stove had been disconnected; three balls of burned newspaper were found on stairs leading to the basement; and there was evidence that gasoline had been poured in more than one place inside the home.
5. The City of Germantown offered to remove the grafitti free of charge the same day and she refused.

Well once the facts came out and Kane's little column was revealed for the bullshit it was he printed this column in which of course his little ego wouldn't let him admit he was wrong in any way. I mean, how could he be wrong for not knowing the story before he printed his slanted opinion on it? Not even knowing that the city volunteered to remove the grafitti (which was known by others at the time) and making his statement saying "To this city dweller, it does seem like the Village of Germantown is more concerned about getting Smith to paint her garage to appease her neighbors than finding out who put the racial slur there in the first place." Maybe the other people just know how to do their homework before they spout off?

In his new column he states:
"I may be hard-headed, but I think the first column was a fair and accurate depiction of a black woman in the suburbs with a racist message painted on her garage."
Yes, you are hard-headed, no you don't think, and you know damn well it was not a fair and accurate depiction. ITS BEEN PROVEN that it wasn't.

He also says:
"I never cast blame at her neighbors; I wondered why village officials seemed more intent on making her paint over the message than finding out who put it there."
um...why didn't you know at the time like others did that she REFUSED to have it covered up for free by the city? Gee, that was a conveniant bit of info you left out.

and:
"It turns out they were investigating her involvement all the time but didn't tell me that. "
Who the hell do you think you are that they should let you in on the detais of the investigation?? You said yourself in your last colum that "According to Germantown police Chief Peter Hoell, the investigation into the incident, including possible arson involving Smith's home, was ongoing"
So you outright contradict yourself here....can you say "full of shit"?
Maybe next investigation the Chief will stop and say "oh wait, shit, we didn't let old genie in on the details". GET OVER YOURSELF

Finally he says:
"The media aren't perfect"....oh my God, relish it folks, thats as close as this guy is ever going to get to admitting he can make a mistake.

Sorry this incident didn't fit into your racially motivated agenda Eugene. Don't worry though, I'm sure you'll find another story you can twist to suit you.

Thank You For The Wiretapping

Been reading news reports and various blogs about this for last couple days and planned to write on it today until I ran across this article in the Wall Street Journal. Is nice to read an article from people that do their homework and point out the facts instead of just spouting popular liberal catch phrases of the day and emotional opinions from those that only listen to one politicaly motivated side of the issues.
Take a few minutes to read the article and you'll be more educated and glad you did.


Thank You for Wiretapping
Why the Founders made presidents dominant on national security.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST

Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold wants to be President, and that's fair enough. By all means go for it in 2008. The same applies to Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who's always on the Sunday shows fretting about the latest criticism of the Bush Administration's prosecution of the war on terror. But until you run nationwide and win, Senators, please stop stripping the Presidency of its Constitutional authority to defend America.

That is the real issue raised by the Beltway furor over last week's leak of National Security Agency wiretaps on international phone calls involving al Qaeda suspects. The usual assortment of Senators and media potentates is howling that the wiretaps are "illegal," done "in total secret," and threaten to bring us a long, dark night of fascism. "I believe it does violate the law," averred Mr. Feingold on CNN Sunday.

The truth is closer to the opposite. What we really have here is a perfect illustration of why America's Founders gave the executive branch the largest measure of Constitutional authority on national security. They recognized that a committee of 535 talking heads couldn't be trusted with such grave responsibility. There is no evidence that these wiretaps violate the law. But there is lots of evidence that the Senators are "illegally" usurping Presidential power--and endangering the country in the process.

The allegation of Presidential law-breaking rests solely on the fact that Mr. Bush authorized wiretaps without first getting the approval of the court established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. But no Administration then or since has ever conceded that that Act trumped a President's power to make exceptions to FISA if national security required it. FISA established a process by which certain wiretaps in the context of the Cold War could be approved, not a limit on what wiretaps could ever be allowed.
The courts have been explicit on this point, most recently in In Re: Sealed Case, the 2002 opinion by the special panel of appellate judges established to hear FISA appeals. In its per curiam opinion, the court noted that in a previous FISA case (U.S. v. Truong), a federal "court, as did all the other courts to have decided the issue [our emphasis], held that the President did have inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information." And further that "we take for granted that the President does have that authority and, assuming that is so, FISA could not encroach on the President's constitutional power."

On Sunday Mr. Graham opined that "I don't know of any legal basis to go around" FISA--which suggests that next time he should do his homework before he implies on national TV that a President is acting like a dictator. (Mr. Graham made his admission of ignorance on CBS's "Face the Nation," where he was representing the Republican point of view. Democrat Joe Biden was certain that laws had been broken, while the two journalists asking questions clearly had no idea what they were talking about. So much for enlightening television.)

The mere Constitution aside, the evidence is also abundant that the Administration was scrupulous in limiting the FISA exceptions. They applied only to calls involving al Qaeda suspects or those with terrorist ties. Far from being "secret," key Members of Congress were informed about them at least 12 times, President Bush said yesterday. The two district court judges who have presided over the FISA court since 9/11 also knew about them.

Inside the executive branch, the process allowing the wiretaps was routinely reviewed by Justice Department lawyers, by the Attorney General personally, and with the President himself reauthorizing the process every 45 days. In short, the implication that this is some LBJ-J. Edgar Hoover operation designed to skirt the law to spy on domestic political enemies is nothing less than a political smear.

All the more so because there are sound and essential security reasons for allowing such wiretaps. The FISA process was designed for wiretaps on suspected foreign agents operating in this country during the Cold War. In that context, we had the luxury of time to go to the FISA court for a warrant to spy on, say, the economic counselor at the Soviet embassy.

In the war on terror, the communications between terrorists in Frankfurt and agents in Florida are harder to track, and when we gather a lead the response often has to be immediate. As we learned on 9/11, acting with dispatch can be a matter of life and death. The information gathered in these wiretaps is not for criminal prosecution but solely to detect and deter future attacks. This is precisely the kind of contingency for which Presidential power and responsibility is designed.

What the critics in Congress seem to be proposing--to the extent they've even thought much about it--is the establishment of a new intelligence "wall" that would allow the NSA only to tap phones overseas while the FBI would tap them here. Terrorists aren't about to honor such a distinction. As Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press," before 9/11 "our intelligence agencies looked out; our law enforcement agencies looked in. And people could--terrorists could--exploit the seam between them." The wiretaps are designed to close the seam.

As for power without responsibility, nobody beats Congress. Mr. Bush has publicly acknowledged and defended his decisions. But the Members of Congress who were informed about this all along are now either silent or claim they didn't get the full story. This is why these columns have long opposed requiring the disclosure of classified operations to the Congressional Intelligence Committees. Congress wants to be aware of everything the executive branch does, but without being accountable for anything at all. If Democrats want to continue this game of intelligence and wiretap "gotcha," the White House should release the names of every Congressman who received such a briefing.
Which brings us to this national security leak, which Mr. Bush yesterday called "a shameful act." We won't second-guess the New York Times decision to publish. But everyone should note the irony that both the Times and Washington Post claimed to be outraged by, and demanded a special counsel to investigate, the leak of Valerie Plame's identity, which did zero national security damage.

By contrast, the Times' NSA leak last week, and an earlier leak in the Washington Post on "secret" prisons for al Qaeda detainees in Europe, are likely to do genuine harm by alerting terrorists to our defenses. If more reporters from these newspapers now face the choice of revealing their sources or ending up in jail, those two papers will share the Plame blame.

The NSA wiretap uproar is one of those episodes, alas far too common, that make us wonder if Washington is still a serious place. Too many in the media and on Capitol Hill have forgotten that terrorism in the age of WMD poses an existential threat to our free society. We're glad Mr. Bush and his team are forcefully defending their entirely legal and necessary authority to wiretap enemies seeking to kill innocent Americans.